Barcelona Orders the Closure of 30 Cannabis Clubs

Barcelona city council has ordered the closure of over 30 cannabis clubs, following a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated local regulations protecting these establishments. The crackdown has sparked international criticism and advocacy, with proponents arguing that the closures undermine public health efforts and the progressive cannabis club model, which has gained traction in other countries.

In recent months, the cannabis landscape in Barcelona has been marked by uncertainty, as the city council has intensified its efforts to close numerous cannabis clubs. These establishments, once a crucial element of cannabis access, are now facing regulatory crackdowns that threaten their existence.

For more news like this, along with all the latest in legalization, research, and lifestyle, download our free cannabis news app.

Regulatory Challenges and Enforcement Measures in Barcelona

The crackdown in Barcelona, led by Albert Batlle, Deputy Mayor of Barcelona and Security Councilor, marks a decisive shift in the city’s approach to cannabis regulation. According to a report by ElDiario, “the Barcelona City Council has begun notifying dozens of cannabis clubs in the city that they must cease operations.”

This decision comes after years of legal battles that culminated in a Supreme Court ruling overturning a local regulation protecting these Barcelona clubs.

The regulatory framework, initially established in 2016 to govern the activities of the clubs, was struck down by the courts, leaving these establishments without clear legal protection. As a result, the Barcelona city council has stepped up its enforcement efforts, launching inspections and issuing closure notices to many clubs. These actions aim to put an end to what Mr. Batlle described as a proliferation that required legal control.

Barcelona Cannabis Clubs Face Legal Ambiguities and Closure Notices

The recent wave of closure notices affects more than 30 establishments in Barcelona initially, with more expected to follow. The clubs have a brief window to contest the closures, typically 10 days, after which a final decision will be made regarding their fate. Despite efforts by some clubs to comply with the remaining legal parameters, including restricting access to cannabis, the city council’s position remains unwavering.

The closure campaign has sparked significant debate in Barcelona and beyond. While local authorities advocate for stricter regulation to address social and legal issues associated with cannabis consumption, critics argue that such measures undermine public health and human rights efforts. International support for Barcelona’s social cannabis clubs remains strong, with advocates highlighting their role in risk reduction and community health.

CATFAC, a federation of cannabis consumer associations, has vehemently opposed the judicialization of the issue, arguing that it fails to address underlying problems. Many stakeholders in the Barcelona cannabis industry are particularly frustrated that long-standing cooperative associations and newer, more contentious clubs are being treated the same way.

A spokesperson for CATFAC informed cannabisindustrie.nl that none of the clubs receiving a letter are members of the federation.

International Comparisons and Advocacy Efforts

Internationally, the social cannabis club model established in Barcelona has gained popularity in countries like Germany, Switzerland, Malta, and the Czech Republic, which are exploring similar frameworks. Advocates of this model emphasize the role of these clubs in reducing reliance on illicit markets and minimizing associated risks.

In response to the Barcelona city council’s measures, a coalition of academics and NGOs from around the world sent a letter to the mayor of Barcelona, urging reconsideration of the closures. According to them, these measures not only stifle progressive drug policies but also overlook the Barcelona clubs’ contributions to public health initiatives supported by the Catalan Ministry of Health.

—

(Featured image by Florian Wehde via Unsplash)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third-party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff, or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in Newsweed, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.