California Opens Debate on Cannabis Potency With New Report

A new California Department of Public Health report has come out with recommendations for THC concentration caps, neutral packaging, and a state-run monopoly on the cannabis market to address high-potency cannabis and reduce youth appeal. Proposed reforms include THC-based taxation, stricter advertising controls, and increased public health funding to curb health risks and illegal market growth.

A new report published Wednesday by a panel of experts assembled by the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) offers a number of major policy recommendations that could radically alter the state’s cannabis market. These include limits on THC content in cannabis flower and concentrates, requirements for neutral packaging, and the establishment of a state-run cannabis monopoly similar to Quebec’s model.

For more news like this, along with all the latest in legalization, research, and lifestyle, download our free cannabis news app.

Overview of Policy Reccomendations on the California Cannabis Market Impact

Here’s an overview of their recommendations and the potential impact they could have on California’s cannabis market.

The Cannabis Potency Debate in California

The High Potency Cannabis Think Tank’s report highlights a critical trend: the cannabis industry’s gradual shift toward high-THC products.

THC content in cannabis flowers often exceeds 20%, while concentrates can reach up to 90% THC. The report warns that this increase in potency risks worsening cannabis use disorders and could have negative mental health impacts. It also raises concerns about the appeal of stronger products to young consumers, emphasizing the need for proactive regulations to limit access and exposure.

“Our recommendations focus on cannabis regulation… taking into account the harmful effects of overconsumption of a legal intoxicating substance and protecting youth,” explains Rosalie Liccardo Pacula of the University of Southern California.

One major recommendation for California is to set THC caps: 25% THC for cannabis flower and 60% for concentrates. Edible products would also face stricter regulations, with a maximum of 10 mg of THC per package – down from today’s 100 mg.

High-THC products should be sold in neutral packaging, limiting branding and design elements that might appeal to young people. The report also advocates banning flavored cannabis products, mirroring tobacco industry practices aimed at reducing youth appeal.

Public Monopoly Sales Model

The report recommends that California adopt a public monopoly model for cannabis sales, similar to the model used by the Quebec Cannabis Corporation (SQDC) in Quebec.

This approach would establish stronger government oversight and reduce access points for the illegal market.

In California, this could significantly impact regions that have opted not to legalize cannabis at the local level. A centralized model could enable state authorities to implement uniform policies on potency, packaging, and youth access.

THC-Based Tax Reform

The report suggests restructuring California’s cannabis tax system by adopting a THC-based model, moving away from the current ad valorem sales-based structure.

By tying tax rates to THC content, the state of California could discourage high-potency products, which are often linked to higher rates of cannabis dependence and mental health issues.

Advertising and Marketing Restrictions

Recognizing the role of marketing in influencing consumer behavior, the report recommends banning billboards and general advertising likely to appeal to young audiences. Age verification on cannabis websites would also become more stringent to ensure limited access for minors.

Daniele Piomelli, co-author of the report and director of the Center for the Study of Cannabis at the University of Irvine, emphasized that the proposed changes could greatly benefit public health in California.

“It is essential to limit exposure… to reduce the risk of long-term health damage,” Piomelli noted, especially for youth and vulnerable populations.

Funding for Public Health Campaigns

The report advocates for investing at least $10 million from cannabis tax revenues into public health campaigns.

These campaigns would inform California consumers of the risks associated with high-potency cannabis use, including effects on mental health, pregnancy, and driving.

Researchers also stress the need to monitor and report adverse health effects related to cannabis, particularly emergency cases involving high-potency cannabis.

Limiting Influence of Unregulated Hemp Products in California

California’s unregulated hemp market has seen an influx of products containing potent psychoactive cannabinoids like Delta-8 THC and THC-P.

These products, often marketed as consumer goods, can be legally sold to minors in convenience stores.

Aware of this loophole, Governor Gavin Newsom recently enacted emergency regulations to ban intoxicating hemp products with detectable THC content. This action aligns with the report’s emphasis on the urgent need for consistent regulations to limit youth access to psychoactive hemp products.

—

(Featured image by Joe Flood (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) via Flickr)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third-party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff, or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in Newsweed, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.