Legalizace, Czech Cannabis Magazine, Accused of “Promoting Drug Addiction”, Wins Case

The Czech Constitutional Court overturned a previous ruling accusing Robert Veverka, former editor of Legalizace, a cannabis magazine, of “promoting drug addiction”, citing the importance of freedom of speech and protecting democratic rights. Despite facing financial and emotional challenges from legal battles, Veverka remains committed to advocating for rational drug policy reforms.

In a significant ruling, the Czech Constitutional Court overturned a previous decision against Robert Veverka, a member of the Pirate Party and former editor-in-chief of the Czech cannabis magazine Legalizace, who had been accused of “promoting drug addiction.”

The Court ruled that restricting publications like Legalizace infringes upon the democratic principle of freedom of speech.

For more news like this, along with all the latest in legalization, research, and lifestyle, download our free cannabis news app.

Context: Arguments Against Legalizace

Robert Veverka and his publication, Legalizace, were accused of “spreading drug addiction.” Since 2010, the magazine had served as a platform for expert articles on cannabis, encouraging public discourse on topics ranging from cultivation practices to drug policy reform.

The Bruntál District Court initially sentenced Robert Veverka to probation and a fine, which was later increased to a quarter of a million crowns (10,000 euros) by the Ostrava Regional Court. The courts argued that Legalizace magazine provided instructions on obtaining and consuming cannabis illegally.

Veverka vehemently denied these allegations against himself and Legalizace, calling the judgment a “Bolshevik relic” and a threat to democratic freedoms.

The Constitutional Court’s Decision

On December 5, the Constitutional Court annulled the previous decisions against Legalizace, citing the fundamental importance of freedom of speech in a democratic society. Judge Tomáš Langášek stated that in cases of controversial speech, the preservation of freedom must take precedence, even at the risk of allowing potentially harmful discourse. He remarked:

“Without an open and free debate – even on controversial issues such as substance abuse – democracy cannot function effectively.”

This ruling for Legalizace requires the appellate court to reconsider the case, excluding articles deemed protected by freedom of speech.

The Damage Is Done to Veverka and Legalizace

These various legal battles financially ruined Veverka, forcing the closure of Legalizace in 2022 after 12 years and 69 issues. His fellow activists and members of the Pirate Party rallied behind him, raising funds and publicly defending his right to publish. Ivan Bartoš, former president of the Pirate Party, stated:

“The Pirates will always protect free access to information. The courts are criminalizing the sharing of information that is completely harmless to society.”

Despite the financial and emotional toll to himself and Legalizace, Veverka remains determined.

“This was about protecting freedom of speech and the right to information,” he said, vowing to continue advocating for rational drug policy reforms.

Cannabis activist Lukas Hurt, a partner of Robert Veverka and both co-editors of Konopí, a magazine focused on medical cannabis, hailed the decision, stating: “This decision is a victory, not only for cannabis but also for Europe [and] for the freedom of our plant and for democracy itself.”

This decision for Legalizace comes at a time when the Czech Republic is working to reform its drug laws in general and cannabis laws in particular, having recently decriminalized home cultivation while awaiting potential full legalization.

—

(Featured image by KATRIN BOLOVTSOVA via Pexels)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third-party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff, or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in Newsweed, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.