California has a reputation for being one of the most cannabis-friendly places in the world. Despite legalizing cannabis for all uses in 2016, California still has a black market issue and Michigan is also seeing the same trend. Four of five municipalities closed their borders to cannabis companies in Michigan, while others are simply concerned about the impact on their communities.
Four out of five municipalities have closed their borders to companies related to cannabis in Michigan.
Many take a wait-and-see approach, allowing the pros and cons of legalizing recreational use (sales were to start on Sunday) before allowing businesses to open up. Others are simply concerned about the impact of drugs on their communities.
The shortage of hosting communities and questionable regulatory measures, combined with the fact that the Michigan Cannabis Regulatory Agency did not license cannabis producers, led to a product shortage.
Stay informed with the latest hemp news application – the resource to learn more about cannabis. This app helps readers digest cannabis news summaries and avoid time-wasted searching the net for new information in this field.
This shortage has led to an increase in prices. Prices have gone up as high as $480 per ounce for high-end medical cannabis in Michigan, compared to only $300 per ounce for the same product on the illegal market.
All this is contributing to a high probability that the cannabis black market will continue to thrive.
California regulated the adult cannabis market in 2017. However, this year, illegal cannabis sales are expected to triple to nearly $9 billion, according to data from the United Cannabis Business Association.
Only 89 of California’s 482 cities allowed recreational clinics according to the Los Angeles Times. More than 1,200 of Michigan’s 1,773 cities, townships and other municipalities have decided not to allow adult recreational cannabis companies to operate at their borders.
Only six recreational cannabis clinics in Michigan have been authorized by the MRA to sell cannabis products to adults, and only three in southeast Michigan, all located in Ann Arbor, are expected to be selling products.
“What happens when you have insufficient access is less competition, higher prices, and less product variety,” said Andrew Livingston, Director of Economics and Research at Denver-based cannabis law firm Vicente Sederberg LLP.
“All this leaves the consumer wondering why they’re going to buy in this store window 45-minutes away and stand in line to pay 35% more above the market price? Is it any better than the (illegal) dealer who visits their home?” said Livingston.
Livingston said that communities often choose to withdraw because it is easier than writing their own regulations and policies.
“States define the framework, but local governments are responsible for managing local zoning, opening hours and other rules,” Livingston said. “Sometimes local governments just don’t want to work with all this, not because of obvious cultural problems with cannabis, but because there are many things to deal with.”
The MRA is aware of the inaccessibility of its experience in legalizing cannabis for medical purposes, which voters approved in 2008 but was not fully operational for nearly 10 years.
As of Nov. 12, 40 of Michigan’s 83 counties did not have municipalities that allowed a single medical clinic for cannabis in Michigan.
“This will create very large bands of inaccessibility for cannabis products and where there is a demand, it will be met in one way or another,” said Andrew Brisbo, Executive Director of MRA. “I think part of our approach is to provide access to the regulated market, because at the end of the day if consumers want to use cannabis products, we want them to use safe products.”
__
(Featured image by Patrick Tomasso via Unsplash)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in JAMBON BURST, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
Berlin is launching a pilot project in the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and Neukölln districts to study the…
The Czech Constitutional Court overturned a previous ruling accusing Robert Veverka, former editor of Legalizace,…
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has declared the war on drugs a…
Pennsylvania lawmakers have proposed a plan to legalize recreational cannabis by 2025. Projections estimate up…
The DEA just held its first procedural hearing on cannabis reclassification, although the focus was…
The Superior Court of Justice in Brazil has legalized the cultivation, processing, and sale of…