South African Supreme Court Says Cannabis Grow Clubs are Illegal

In 2017, South Africa’s Supreme Court ruled that the government has no right to regulate what people do in their own homes. As such, it could not prevent citizens from growing cannabis plants if they so choose. The result was a quasi-legalization of cannabis for private use, although the commercialization of cannabis remained prohibited.

However, while cannabis commercialization was still prohibited, some enterprising entrepreneurs created a new model based on the idea of a “grow club,” which was like a private gardening club. The idea was that citizens could rent the land and equipment to grow cannabis. And, as part of the deal, someone would tend to their plot.

But now, South Africa’s Supreme Court has agreed that there is no significant difference between a dealer and a “grow club.” As a result, the High Court says it is not for the courts to decide the legality of “grow clubs,” which intend to circumvent the Drugs Act, which regulates drug use in South Africa.

For more news like this, download our free cannabis news app.

South Africa’s High Court Dismissed the Haze Club Case

Based on the right to self-determination, Cannabis Social Clubs sprang up all over the place after the decriminalization of cannabis in South Africa. One of them, The Haze Club (THC), was raided by the police and attempted to argue, through a High Court case, that Cannabis Social Clubs are a solution for people unwilling or unable to grow their own.

The High Court of Cape Town announced this week that it would reject the club’s application. The Haze Club could appeal, but Justice Slingers’ decision confirms that the legalization of commerce and cannabis are policy issues and fall within the legislature’s jurisdiction, not the judiciary.

Supreme Court Rules Grow Clubs Are not Private Spaces

The state argued that the club was not operating in a private space and was, therefore, violating the law.

In her decision, Justice Slingers said that allowing a growers’ club to operate without statutory or regulatory requirements and guidelines “could have the practical effect of legalizing the sale of cannabis.”

“It may be that the legislature will consider legislating on this issue in the future, but that does not mean that the courts should anticipate it. Legalizing commerce and cannabis involves policy issues and is within the legislature’s purview, not the judiciary.”

She said that plaintiffs and their clients are not prevented from using or growing cannabis: they are simply prevented from outsourcing that right.

Therefore, Grow Clubs Are Illegal

The operation of a “grow club” is, therefore, still considered a criminal act under South Africa’s drug trafficking law, and a conviction can result in a prison sentence.

The “grow club” was based on a business model in which a person or entity rents out land, equipment, and gardening services. They would then use the “rented” land to grow plant material, including cannabis, on behalf of their customers. The theory was that the business does not own or supply its customers with cannabis, cannabis plants, or feminized cannabis seeds since the customer is “renting” the lot.

A Supreme Court Appeal Is Likely

Shaad Vayej, a lawyer for the Haze Club, said an appeal is likely: “Unfortunately, the Haze Club’s application was dismissed by the Cape Town High Court. This judgment represents a narrow interpretation of the right to privacy, which is a private space, and restrictions on the private cultivation of cannabis, as contemplated by the Constitutional Court in the Prince 3 case.”

“However, this is not the end of the road, as an appeal is likely to follow.”

—

(Featured image by Jacques Nel via Unsplash)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third-party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff, or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published by Newsweed, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions, or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.