Cannabis in Spain is illegal for commercial purposes, but decriminalized for personal cultivation and use, and other purposes other than sale or trade. The Spanish City Council does not have the right to fine for cannabis possession on public roads due to the new regulations. As a consequence of this, thousands of fines given by City Councils could now be annulled by judges.
Last week there was a ruling that can be considered historic in Spain, through which the court established that the City Council cannot fine for cannabis possession in public.
A more than relevant sentence regarding cannabis was given in Yecla, a Region of Murcia. An administrative court of Murcia issued a sentence, establishing that the City Council of Yecla cannot sanction the possession of cannabis in public.
With this new sentence, which saw the light recently, the doors are open to the annulment of thousands of fines for possession of cannabis or hashish on public roads, which were imposed by the municipalities. According to the ruling, city councils will no longer have the power to fine for possession on the public roads if they did not have them delegated.
Learn more about cannabis legalization and other interesting facts with our Hemp.im mobile app. Hemp.im provides important global hemp industry news and helps strengthen the community of growers, builders, manufacturers, and other key players.
One particular case refers to a citizen of the city of Yecla who had been fined $11,592 (€10,401) for repeated possession on the public roads. His lawyer, Francisco Azorín, explained that the sentence went much further “This sentence serves to revoke all sanctions for possession or consumption of drugs imposed in most municipalities in Spain,” he said.
Furthermore, this sentence would be an unexpected twist on the “hated” Gag Rule. “Since the entry into force of the Law 4/2015, on the Protection of Citizen Security [the aforementioned Gag Law], many city councils have sanctioned drug possession,” Azorín explained. “However, most of them do not have competence in the matter as required by this law. It was clearer in the previous Citizen Security Law [known as the Corcuera law]. Therefore, all those sanctioned who request it will be able to take advantage of the procedure for revoking acts that are null and void as long as they do so before four years after the sanction becomes final.”
In fact, the sentence now handed down by the court would go in that direction. The municipalities by default would not have the power to sanction for possession of drugs on the streets. According to lawyer Francisco Azorín, the majority have not done so and, therefore, the fines they impose would be null and void. Now there is a precedent.
Cannabis is now in a kind of legal limbo in Spain. Cannabis consumption is legal at home, as it is planting in small quantities. Although, transporting and consuming cannabis in the street is illegal. This is where most fines and administrative fines would come from when small quantities were involved.
Francisco Azorín of the Brotsanbert law firm, and specialist in cannabis issues, now receives the judge’s reason. The Court’s argument is that the city council would not have the power to fine for this reason for cannabis possession. Of course, neither Yecla’s nor any of the Murcia region, nor probably any of Spain’s.
Azorín argued during the trial that the Yecla City Council does not have the power to sanction for this infraction because “there is no specific regulation that attributes it,” as required by the same Gag law.
__
(Featured image by Wesley Gibbs via Unsplash)
DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.
This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.
First published in La Marihuana, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.
Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.
Berlin is launching a pilot project in the Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg and Neukölln districts to study the…
The Czech Constitutional Court overturned a previous ruling accusing Robert Veverka, former editor of Legalizace,…
U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk has declared the war on drugs a…
Pennsylvania lawmakers have proposed a plan to legalize recreational cannabis by 2025. Projections estimate up…
The DEA just held its first procedural hearing on cannabis reclassification, although the focus was…
The Superior Court of Justice in Brazil has legalized the cultivation, processing, and sale of…