By / February 12, 2020

The European Observatory questions the government on licensing cannabis

The European Observatory for Cannabis Consumption and Cultivation (OECCC) has asked the Spanish government for concrete information on the granting of licences for the cultivation of medical cannabis in Spain. According to the Madrid newspaper Público, the Spanish Agency for Medicine and Health Products (AEMPS), a department of the Ministry of Health, is now facing the first administrative test of its intentions in the field of cannabis regulation.

The OECCC includes a Spanish group of legal and health experts, among others, and is concerned with favoring large multinational companies to the detriment of small national producers and entrepreneurs. The Observatory intends to use the Transparency, Access to Public Information and Good Governance Act of 2013 to learn about the procedures of the AEMPS, which, in its opinion, has carried out the licensing procedures with opaqueness, without knowing the reasons why some applications for cultivation permits are approved and others rejected, ending up favoring large companies and excluding small producers and entrepreneurs.

Hemp.im provides important global cannabis industry news and is the leading source for all of the latest financial, legal and B2B news in the hemp industry.

Four companies are allowed to grow cannabis for medical purposes in Spain

The new PSOE coalition government now has to clarify its intentions in the field of cannabis regulation. Between 2018 and 2019, the AEMPS received 44 requests for cultivation permits.

Based on last year’s data provided by the AEMPS, there are four companies in Spain authorized to grow a total of 15.3 hectares of cannabis for medical and scientific purposes: Cafina, based in Alicante, Linneo Health, with British capital and managed by businessman Juan Abelló, with extensive experience in the pharmaceutical industry, Oils4cure, based in Madrid, and Cannabinoids Spain, located in Córdoba. In addition to these four companies, there are six other entities authorized to grow cannabis, but only for research and development.

According to the OECCC, the goverment is not very transparent at the time of granting licenses for the cultivation of medical cannabis affecting several companies. (Source)

OECCC denounces the lack of transparency in granting the permits

The Observatory has requested from the Medicines Agency the number, type of authorizations and the beneficiaries of the permits granted for cannabis cultivation from 2015 to date, in writing. Moreover, AEMPS has to specify the conditions necessary to allow the license granted to the national Alcaliber group to be subsequently transferred, according to its information, for a value of $10,3 million (€9,4 million) to the international group Linneo Health, which participated in the British GHO fund, based in the Cayman Islands.

The organization also wants to know which companies are authorized to produce cosmetics with cannabinoids and which use synthetic or natural cannabinoids, national or imported, and whether they are from their own crops or purchased.

According to the Observatory’s group of experts, the government’s lack of transparency on the subject has reached an extreme, in which the answers given to parliamentary groups in recent years, on questions about licenses granted, and the criteria that are followed do not coincide with the figures provided to each company, as well as the data presented by the AEMPS website.

Pre-constitutional rules for cannabis cultivation

The rules by which AEMPS is governed for the licensing of cannabis cultivation for medical and scientific purposes are pre-constitutional. That is because since the restoration of democracy no law regulating this issue has been passed. The Ministry of Health continues to rely on the 1967 Law on Narcotic Drugs to adapt it to the 1961 United Nations Convention, signed by Francisco Franco to the 1963 Order, on the cultivation of medicinal plants related to narcotics.

The concessions are made for a period of one year, which may be extended by presenting results. To obtain them, companies or entities must detail the forecast of the area to be cultivated, the origin and varieties of seeds, the quantity of THC and CBD of the plants and the destination of production. However, this production must be exported to other countries, since the medical use of cannabis in Spain is not yet allowed.

The companies that cultivate medical cannabis in Spain must export all their production since this type of cultivation is still illegal in this country. (Source)

Political group meetings prepare initiatives

The representatives of the Observatory met, on February 4th, with various parliamentary groups to present their initiatives in favor of cannabis legalization in Spain, once the new legislature had begun. The OECCC had already held meetings in June 2019 with members of various political parties in the Congress of Deputies, in which it presented a proposal for the full legalization of cannabis.

At the time, an initiative to legalize only medical cannabis was suggested, as it was felt to be more feasible than including recreational use as well. The OECCC’s proposed medical cannabis law consists of 123 articles, six additional provisions, and four final ones, to legalize the cultivation of the cannabis plant for medical and therapeutic purposes, access to seeds, production, distribution, patient associations, and a broad system of penalties for violation of the regulations.

__

(Featured image by Greta Schölderle Møller via Unsplash)

DISCLAIMER: This article was written by a third party contributor and does not reflect the opinion of Hemp.im, its management, staff or its associates. Please review our disclaimer for more information.

This article may include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “become,” “plan,” “will,” and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks as well as uncertainties, including those discussed in the following cautionary statements and elsewhere in this article and on this site. Although the Company may believe that its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, the actual results that the Company may achieve may differ materially from any forward-looking statements, which reflect the opinions of the management of the Company only as of the date hereof. Additionally, please make sure to read these important disclosures.

First published in CANNA REPORTER, a third-party contributor translated and adapted the article from the original. In case of discrepancy, the original will prevail.

Although we made reasonable efforts to provide accurate translations, some parts may be incorrect. Hemp.im assumes no responsibility for errors, omissions or ambiguities in the translations provided on this website. Any person or entity relying on translated content does so at their own risk. Hemp.im is not responsible for losses caused by such reliance on the accuracy or reliability of translated information. If you wish to report an error or inaccuracy in the translation, we encourage you to contact us.


Comments are closed for this post.